Journal or Magazine Article, 1983
http://www.rmi.org/Knowledge-Center/Library/1983-02_RealSecurity
This article is a summary of Amory and Hunter Lovins' book,
Brittle Power. The book argues that energy policy creates enormous security risks, primarily through over centralization and technological misapplication.
Journal or Magazine Article, 1982
http://www.rmi.org/Knowledge-Center/Library/E82-02_EnergyEconomicsClimate
In this editorial, Amory Lovins and Hunter Lovins challenge the assumption of ever-increasing carbon dioxide via unchecked fossil fuel combustion. They argue that if energy efficiency measures are promoted, market forces can eliminate the burning of fossil fuels.
Journal or Magazine Article, 1976
http://www.rmi.org/Knowledge-Center/Library/E77-01_EnergyStrategyRoadNotTaken
This landmark article in
Foreign Affairs describes Amory Lovins' concepts of the "hard path" and "soft path" of energy use. This piece established Lovins as an innovative voice in the ongoing energy debate.
Journal or Magazine Article, 1992
http://www.rmi.org/Knowledge-Center/Library/S93-01_FuelingACompetitiveEconomy
This article, which originally appeared in Foreign Affairs in 1992, presents a comprehensive plan to revive America's competitiveness using energy efficiency to prime the economic pump, an industrial policy to guide fresh capital injections, and environmental technology to create a cottage industry for the 21st century.
Journal or Magazine Article, 2012
http://www.rmi.org/Knowledge-Center/Library/2012-01_FarewellToFossilFuels
In this article published in
Foreign Affairs, Amory Lovins describes a U.S. transition from fossil fuels--a blueprint detailed in
Reinventing Fire-- that requires pursuing transformational change in automotive efficiency, design of buildings and factories, and the electric system.
Journal or Magazine Article, 2001
http://www.rmi.org/Knowledge-Center/Library/E01-04_FoolsGoldAlaskaAnnotated
In this annotated version of the article from
Foreign Affairs, the authors argue against drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for economic, security, and environmental reasons. For the complete article, see
"Fool's Gold in Alaska," (RMI document ID E01-03).
Journal or Magazine Article, 2001
http://www.rmi.org/Knowledge-Center/Library/E01-03_FoolsGoldAlaska
In this article from
Foreign Affairs the authors argue against drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for economic, security, and environmental reasons.
Journal or Magazine Article, 2011
http://www.rmi.org/Knowledge-Center/Library/2011-09_GaikoSoftEnergyPaths
Japan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs asked Amory Lovins to outline his reaction to the Fukushima disaster and his suggestions for Japanese and U.S. energy policy for its house magazine
Gaiko (
Diplomacy). An abridged version was published 30 July 2011 in Japanese and is cited in this unabridged English version. It's a timely contribution to the rapidly growing movement in Japan to accelerate the strategic shift from nuclear power to efficiency and renewables, as Germany is already doing—an approach consistent with sound economics and with RMI's U.S. findings in
Reinventing Fire. The abridged version of the article is available at
http://www.gaiko-web.jp/ in Japanese.
Journal or Magazine Article, 2010
http://www.rmi.org/Knowledge-Center/Library/2010-03_ForeignPolicyProliferationClimateOilPattern
Proliferation, climate change, and oil dependence share both nuclear non-solutions that frustrate U.S. foreign-policy goals and non-nuclear solutions that can achieve them. This synthesis of all three issues shows how reconciling foreign with domestic energy policy can solve these and other big problems at a profit. This essay, first posted 21 January 2010 in
Foreign Policy, is expanded in the annotated paper,
"Proliferation, Oil, and Climate: Solving for Pattern" (RMI document ID S10-02).
Journal or Magazine Article, 1976
http://www.rmi.org/Knowledge-Center/Library/1976-01_NuclearSpreadCureBeginsHome
In this
New York Times op-ed, Amory Lovins commends the paper for calling attention to the link between nuclear power and nuclear weapons, and provides further commentary about the social, political, and economic logic of pursuing a non-nuclear energy future.