Listed below are all documents and RMI.org site pages related to this topic.
Energy and Resources - Subsidies 7 Items
Report or White Paper, 2012
This paper explores methods of quantifying natural gas
volatility by examining theoretical models as well as case studies of utility hedging strategies. Including these volatility risk premiums in the price of natural gas establishes a basis for even comparison with utility-scale wind contracts, which enables smarter decision analysis by regulatory agencies, utilities, and ratepayers.
Report or White Paper, 2011
This document provides RMI's methodology for the analysis of the electricity sector in Reinventing Fire.
On 26 October 2010, The American Spectator
published William Tucker's critical article about Amory Lovins's "Nuclear Socialism" article in The Weekly Standard
. The American Spectator
didn't acknowledge or publish Mr. Lovins's 1 November reply, so on 14 December he posted it as a comment
and RMI published it here.
Journal or Magazine Article, 2010
In this article in The Weekly Standard
, Amory Lovins explains why the current 100+% subsidies for new nuclear power plants are still unable to attract private capital, yet violate free-market principles, hazard utilities' and taxpayers' financial health, and should be abolished—along with all other energy subsidies.
Journal or Magazine Article, 2005
This paper makes an economic argument against the use of nuclear power. Despite strong governmental support, nuclear power is unfinancible in the private capital market. Nuclear power worldwide has less installed capacity and generates less electricity than its decentralized no- and low-carbon competitors—one-third renewables (excluding big hydroelectric dams), two-thirds fossil-fueled combined-heat-and power. In 2004, these rivals added nearly three times as much output and six times as much capacity as nuclear power added; by 2010, industry forecasts this sixfold ratio to widen to 136–184 as nuclear orders fade, then nuclear capacity gradually disappears as aging reactors retire. These comparisons don’t count more efficient use of electricity, which isn’t being tracked, but efficiency gains plus decentralized sources now add at least ten times as much capacity per year as nuclear power.
Empirical data also confirm that these competing technologies not only are being deployed an order of magnitude faster than nuclear power, but ultimately can become far bigger. Full deployment of these very cost-effective competitors could provide ~13–15 times nuclear power’s current 20% share of electric generation—all without significant land-use, reliability, or other constraints. Expanding nuclear power would both reduce and retard the desired decrease in CO2 emissions.
Journal or Magazine Article, 2001
This article answers the question, can nuclear power solve the energy crisis? According to the authors, nuclear power is too costly, risky, and inefficient to be an answer to the country's energy problems.
Journal or Magazine Article, 1987
This article, published after the oil shocks of the 1970s, details strategies for reducing oil shortages and keeping costs low. The most effective strategy proposed by the authors is substitution.